#Top fragger meaning valorant professional#

As a former professional CSGO player, Hiko brings a plethora of game knowledge to the table. The 100 Thieves star, Spencer “Hiko” Martin, is the team’s most experienced member. Hiko, the star of 100 Thieves, a team among the best in NA, clearly shows why the team is in the place it stands. Spencer ‘Hiko’ Martin Best 5 Valorant Players- Hiko With a KD of 1.40, these stats mean that TenZ is the backbone, pillar, and C9’s squad’s heart.Īs a popular Twitch streamer with over 90 thousand followers on his channel, news spread quickly when he reached the top rank before anyone else with his primary Agents alternating between Jett and Sage and there’s no doubt he will come first in the list of Best 5 Valorant Players. TenZ strengths his hold on the spot with a 0.22 first kills per round ratio, 1.01 KPR, and 173.1 average damage per round. 1 based on average combat score, but it isn’t the only area he thrives in. Later, on January 12th, he decided to step down from Valorant esports for the time being and become a full-time content creator for C9 Blue. For his early career in Valorant, he was signed to the roster of Cloud9 Blue. His exceptional gameplay with Jett sets him apart from the others in NA. After Riot introduced the regional leaderboard system, TenZ had quickly climbed to the top of the list and has been there ever since. TenZ is an incredible Duelist player and he started off as a duelist in Team Cloud9. Tyson ‘ TenZ‘ Ngo Best 5 Valorant Players- TenZ Now that there is an objective ranking measurement for determining who the best of the best are, along with several invitational tournaments happening frequently with top esports organizations, the list of Best 5 Valorant Players is more straightforward. The addition of ranked mode in Valorant has so far been nothing but success with players eagerly diving in and show off their skills and compete against others. With that comes fierce competition. Although, now with some competitions happening in Riot’s new FPS VALORANT, the community is getting a more clear picture of which players are the most skilled in the world. With an increase in the Valorant player-base, new players are entering the fray every day. In Valorant it's difficult to say, because people value different things & the way agents are utilized is not easily quantifiable objectivity goes out the window.Best 5 Valorant Players: Best 5 Valorant Players In CS you can reasonably say who are the most impactful pros with KAST. In OW, you can reasonably say what players are the best at their hero. So then it just becomes a question of 'what assumptions are correct', which will create a years long shitstorm debate about the 'correct' way to do things. If you don't have either of those qualities in the game, creating a model to compare performance of players requires some heavy assumptions, which create biases, which ultimately only make the results of that model reflect that model's assumptions. Or there are no 'heroes' or 'agents' and the players effectively play under the same constraints, making them mostly comparable, like in CS. Either the roles of the agents are well defined and are comparatives in and of themselves. The roles of agents in Valorant are not always so well defined, so agent comparisons are only useful in some cases. The reason this works for OW is because the role of a hero and what you do with that hero is more or less well defined and reflected by the metrics. Overwatch compares the skill of players based on the hero they play and how divergent they are statistically compared to other people playing that hero across many metrics.

Is a Jett main OPer, like Shahz, Jamppi or Wardell comparable to a Jett initiator/fragger like cNed, babybay or russ? What about someone who creates space for their team, like Derke? Difficult to say. So ultimately it is not a good measurement of how good a player is compared to other players, it's just selective of that category of players. Sentinel/Sova baiters and superstar duelists are the dominant players in this category. Some players simply get support from their team to perform well on that metric. But then you run into the question of the role of that player in the team and what agents the others in that team tend to run. If you mean combining agent comparison with K/D, I agree, that would be closer to a more specific, meaningful comparative than just ACS.